Strategic decision points in experiments: A predictive Bayesian optional stopping method
By: Xiaomi Yang, Carol Flannagan, Jonas Bärgman
Potential Business Impact:
Stops experiments early to save money.
Sample size determination is crucial in experimental design, especially in traffic and transport research. Frequentist statistics require a fixed sample size determined by power analysis, which cannot be adjusted once the experiment starts. Bayesian sample size determination, with proper priors, offers an alternative. Bayesian optional stopping (BOS) allows experiments to stop when statistical targets are met. We introduce predictive Bayesian optional stopping (pBOS), combining BOS with Bayesian rehearsal simulations to predict future data and stop experiments if targets are unlikely to be met within resource constraints. We identified and corrected a bias in predictions using multiple linear regression. pBOS shows up to 118% better cost benefit than traditional BOS and is more efficient than frequentist methods. pBOS allows researchers to, under certain conditions, stop experiments when resources are insufficient or when enough data is collected, optimizing resource use and cost savings.
Similar Papers
Bayesian Design of Experiments in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters
Methodology
Finds best experiment size using smart computer learning.
Optimal Stopping for Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design
Methodology
Find the best time to stop experiments.
Group Sequential Design with Posterior and Posterior Predictive Probabilities
Methodology
Helps tests finish faster or stop early.