Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems
By: Laura Weidinger , Inioluwa Deborah Raji , Hanna Wallach and more
Potential Business Impact:
Tests AI to make sure it's safe and works.
There is an increasing imperative to anticipate and understand the performance and safety of generative AI systems in real-world deployment contexts. However, the current evaluation ecosystem is insufficient: Commonly used static benchmarks face validity challenges, and ad hoc case-by-case audits rarely scale. In this piece, we advocate for maturing an evaluation science for generative AI systems. While generative AI creates unique challenges for system safety engineering and measurement science, the field can draw valuable insights from the development of safety evaluation practices in other fields, including transportation, aerospace, and pharmaceutical engineering. In particular, we present three key lessons: Evaluation metrics must be applicable to real-world performance, metrics must be iteratively refined, and evaluation institutions and norms must be established. Applying these insights, we outline a concrete path toward a more rigorous approach for evaluating generative AI systems.
Similar Papers
Evaluation Framework for AI Systems in "the Wild"
Computation and Language
Tests AI to ensure it works well and is fair.
Safety by Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review of AI Safety Evaluation Methods
Artificial Intelligence
Tests AI for dangerous tricks and hidden goals.
A Study on the Framework for Evaluating the Ethics and Trustworthiness of Generative AI
Computers and Society
Makes AI safer and more trustworthy for everyone.