Welfare Approximation in Additively Separable Hedonic Games
By: Martin Bullinger, Vaggos Chatziafratis, Parnian Shahkar
Potential Business Impact:
Helps divide things fairly to make everyone happy.
Partitioning a set of $n$ items or agents while maximizing the value of the partition is a fundamental algorithmic task. We study this problem in the specific setting of maximizing social welfare in additively separable hedonic games. Unfortunately, this task faces strong computational boundaries: Extending previous results, we show that approximating welfare by a factor of $n^{1-\epsilon}$ is NP-hard, even for severely restricted weights. However, we can obtain a randomized $\log n$-approximation on instances for which the sum of input valuations is nonnegative. Finally, we study two stochastic models of aversion-to-enemies games, where the weights are derived from Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi or multipartite graphs. We obtain constant-factor and logarithmic-factor approximations with high probability.
Similar Papers
NP-Hardness of Approximating Nash Social Welfare with Supermodular Valuations
CS and Game Theory
Makes fair sharing of items impossible.
Nash Social Welfare with Submodular Valuations: Approximation Algorithms and Integrality Gaps
CS and Game Theory
Makes sharing items fairer for everyone.
Maximizing social welfare among EF1 allocations at the presence of two types of agents
CS and Game Theory
Divides things fairly, giving almost everyone what they want.