Hate in the Time of Algorithms: Evidence on Online Behavior from a Large-Scale Experiment
By: Aarushi Kalra
Potential Business Impact:
Removes harmful posts, but users find them elsewhere.
Social media algorithms are thought to amplify variation in user beliefs, thus contributing to radicalization. However, quantitative evidence on how algorithms and user preferences jointly shape harmful online engagement is limited. I conduct an individually randomized experiment with 8 million users of an Indian TikTok-like platform, replacing algorithmic ranking with random content delivery. Exposure to "toxic" posts decreases by 27%, mainly due to reduced platform usage by users with higher interest in such content. Strikingly, these users increase engagement with toxic posts they find. Survey evidence indicates shifts to other platforms. Model-based counterfactuals highlight the limitations of blanket algorithmic regulation.
Similar Papers
Algorithms vs. Peers: Shaping Engagement with Novel Content
General Economics
Helps people find new, interesting things online.
Rewarding Engagement and Personalization in Popularity-Based Rankings Amplifies Extremism and Polarization
Social and Information Networks
Makes online sites push people to extreme views.
The Ranking Effect: How Algorithmic Rank Influences Attention on Social Media
Human-Computer Interaction
Changes how you see online posts.