Unreflected Use of Tabular Data Repositories Can Undermine Research Quality
By: Andrej Tschalzev , Lennart Purucker , Stefan Lüdtke and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps scientists use data better for smarter discoveries.
Data repositories have accumulated a large number of tabular datasets from various domains. Machine Learning researchers are actively using these datasets to evaluate novel approaches. Consequently, data repositories have an important standing in tabular data research. They not only host datasets but also provide information on how to use them in supervised learning tasks. In this paper, we argue that, despite great achievements in usability, the unreflected usage of datasets from data repositories may have led to reduced research quality and scientific rigor. We present examples from prominent recent studies that illustrate the problematic use of datasets from OpenML, a large data repository for tabular data. Our illustrations help users of data repositories avoid falling into the traps of (1) using suboptimal model selection strategies, (2) overlooking strong baselines, and (3) inappropriate preprocessing. In response, we discuss possible solutions for how data repositories can prevent the inappropriate use of datasets and become the cornerstones for improved overall quality of empirical research studies.
Similar Papers
Datasheets Aren't Enough: DataRubrics for Automated Quality Metrics and Accountability
Machine Learning (CS)
Makes computer learning data better and easier to check.
Evaluating Latent Knowledge of Public Tabular Datasets in Large Language Models
Computation and Language
Computers might be cheating on tests.
Unveiling the Role of Data Uncertainty in Tabular Deep Learning
Machine Learning (CS)
Explains why smart computer programs work well.