A Cross-Country Analysis of GDPR Cookie Banners and Flexible Methods for Scraping Them
By: Midas Nouwens , Janus Bager Kristensen , Kristjan Maalt and more
Potential Business Impact:
Finds websites tricking you into sharing data.
Online tracking remains problematic, with compliance and ethical issues persisting despite regulatory efforts. Consent interfaces, the visible manifestation of this industry, have seen significant attention over the years. We present robust automated methods to study the presence, design, and third-party suppliers of consent interfaces at scale and the web service consent-observatory.eu to do it with. We examine the top 10,000 websites across 31 countries under the ePrivacy Directive and GDPR (n=254.148). Our findings show that 67% of websites use consent interfaces, but only 15% are minimally compliant, mostly because they lack a reject option. Consent management platforms (CMPs) are powerful intermediaries in this space: 67% of interfaces are provided by CMPs, and three organisations hold 37% of the market. There is little evidence that regulators' guidance and fines have impacted compliance rates, but 18% of compliance variance is explained by CMPs. Researchers should take an infrastructural perspective on online tracking and study the factual control of intermediaries to identify effective leverage points.
Similar Papers
Navigating Cookie Consent Violations Across the Globe
Cryptography and Security
Finds websites that ignore your cookie choices.
Intractable Cookie Crumbs: Unveiling the Nexus of Stateful Banner Interaction and Tracking Cookies
Networking and Internet Architecture
Websites secretly track you even after you say no.
Using Salient Object Detection to Identify Manipulative Cookie Banners that Circumvent GDPR
Computers and Society
Finds sneaky tricks in website privacy pop-ups.