Evaluating AI Recruitment Sourcing Tools by Human Preference
By: Vladimir Slaykovskiy , Maksim Zvegintsev , Yury Sakhonchyk and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps find better job candidates faster.
This study introduces a benchmarking methodology designed to evaluate the performance of AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools. We created and utilized a dataset to perform a comparative analysis of search results generated by leading AI-based solutions, LinkedIn Recruiter, and our proprietary system, Pearch.ai. Human experts assessed the relevance of the returned candidates, and an Elo rating system was applied to quantitatively measure each tool's comparative performance. Our findings indicate that AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools consistently outperform LinkedIn Recruiter in candidate relevance, with Pearch.ai achieving the highest performance scores. Furthermore, we found a strong alignment between AI-based evaluations and human judgments, highlighting the potential for advanced AI technologies to substantially enhance talent acquisition effectiveness. Code and supporting data are publicly available at https://github.com/vslaykovsky/ai-sourcing-benchmark
Similar Papers
Better Together: Quantifying the Benefits of AI-Assisted Recruitment
Computation and Language
Helps hire better workers faster with AI.
AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights
Computers and Society
AI favors its own writing over yours.
Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Enhancement Protocol
Software Engineering
Finds best AI tools for coding and fixing bugs.