Optimal macroprudential policy with preemptive bailouts
By: Aliaksandr Zaretski
Potential Business Impact:
Fixes banks to stop money problems.
I study the optimal regulation of a financial sector where individual banks face self-enforcing constraints countering their default incentives. The constrained-efficient social planner can improve over the unregulated equilibrium in two dimensions. First, by internalizing the impact of banks' portfolio decisions on the prices of assets and liabilities that affect the enforcement constraints. Second, by redistributing future net worth from new entrants to surviving banks, which increases the current forward-looking value of all banks, relaxing their enforcement constraints and decreasing the probability of banking crises. The latter can be accomplished with systemic preemptive bailouts that are time consistent and unambiguously welfare improving. Unregulated banks can be both overleveraged and underleveraged depending on the state of the economy, thus macroprudential policy requires both taxes and subsidies, while minimum bank capital requirements are generally ineffective.
Similar Papers
Bailouts and Redistribution
General Economics
Taxing bank money helps people when economy is bad.
The Interaction Between Domestic Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy in Israel
General Economics
Banks lend less to homes, more to businesses.
Balancing Profit and Fairness in Risk-Based Pricing Markets
Artificial Intelligence
Makes sure everyone can afford important things.