Blending Queries and Conversations: Understanding Tactics, Trust, Verification, and System Choice in Web Search and Chat Interactions
By: Kerstin Mayerhofer, Rob Capra, David Elsweiler
Potential Business Impact:
AI helps people find health info, but can trick them.
This paper presents a user study (N=22) where participants used an interface combining Web Search and a Generative AI-Chat feature to solve health-related information tasks. We study how people behaved with the interface, why they behaved in certain ways, and what the outcomes of these behaviours were. A think-aloud protocol captured their thought processes during searches. Our findings suggest that GenAI is neither a search panacea nor a major regression compared to standard Web Search interfaces. Qualitative and quantitative analyses identified 78 tactics across five categories and provided insight into how and why different interface features were used. We find evidence that pre-task confidence and trust both influenced which interface feature was used. In both systems, but particularly when using the chat feature, trust was often misplaced in favour of ease-of-use and seemingly perfect answers, leading to increased confidence post-search despite having incorrect results. We discuss what our findings mean in the context of our defined research questions and outline several open questions for future research.
Similar Papers
From Interaction to Collaboration: How Hybrid Intelligence Enhances Chatbot Feedback
Human-Computer Interaction
Makes AI assistants better by getting more helpful feedback.
Examining the Usage of Generative AI Models in Student Learning Activities for Software Programming
Software Engineering
Helps students learn better with AI, not just copy.
Human Trust in AI Search: A Large-Scale Experiment
Computers and Society
Makes people trust AI search more, even if wrong.