Content-aware rankings: a new approach to rankings in scholarship
By: Sean C. Rife , Joshua M. Nicholson , Beatriz Bosques and more
Potential Business Impact:
Ranks universities by how often their research is used.
Entity rankings (e.g., institutions, journals) are a core component of academia and related industries. Existing approaches to institutional rankings have relied on a variety of data sources, and approaches to computing outcomes, but remain controversial. One limitation of existing approaches is reliance on scholarly output (e.g., number of publications associated with a given institution during a time period). We propose a new approach to rankings - one that relies not on scholarly output, but rather on the type of citations received (an implementation of the Scite Index). We describe how the necessary data can be gathered, as well as how relevant metrics are computed. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we present rankings of fields, journals, and institutions, and discuss the various ways Scite's data can be deployed in the context of rankings. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
Similar Papers
Billions at Stake: How Self-Citation Adjusted Metrics Can Transform Equitable Research Funding
Digital Libraries
Makes science awards fairer by fixing fake citations.
Gaming the Metrics? Bibliometric Anomalies and the Integrity Crisis in Global University Rankings
Digital Libraries
Finds fake research to improve university ratings.
How to Find Fantastic Papers: Self-Rankings as a Powerful Predictor of Scientific Impact Beyond Peer Review
Applications
Authors' rankings find better AI research.