Score: 3

DynaServe: Unified and Elastic Execution for Dynamic Disaggregated LLM Serving

Published: April 12, 2025 | arXiv ID: 2504.09285v2

By: Chaoyi Ruan , Yinhe Chen , Dongqi Tian and more

BigTech Affiliations: University of California, Berkeley

Potential Business Impact:

Makes AI talk faster and handle more requests.

Business Areas:
Cloud Computing Internet Services, Software

LLM inference must meet strict latency SLOs (e.g., 100 ms P99 time-between-tokens) while maximizing goodput. Yet, real-world variability in prompt and response lengths skews compute-intensive prefill and memory-bound decode phases, making both colocated (even with chunked prefill) and disaggregated deployments unable to simultaneously deliver low tail latency and high throughput. We introduce DynaServe, a high-performance LLM serving system built atop vLLM that unifies and extends both paradigms for maximizing goodput under SLO constraints, when handling unbalanced and dynamic workloads. It relies on a micro-request abstraction, which arbitrarily splits each request at any token boundary into at most two cooperating segments. A two-level scheduling framework then balances micro-request load across unified GPU instances. The global scheduler rapidly selects per-request split points by considering both the request's prefill/decode time ratio and the current load across GPU instances. The local schedulers on each GPU instance independently form SLO-aware batches, adjusting their composition in response to workload fluctuations, potential latency spikes and per-GPU under/over utilization. On real-world traces, DynaServe boosts the overall serving capacity from 1.15$\times$ to 3.07$\times$, improves goodput by up to 1.91$\times$ and 1.61$\times$, and improves the performance by up to 60\% in a hybrid workload under SLO compared to state-of-the-art colocated and disaggregated baselines.

Country of Origin
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Singapore, United States, China

Page Count
15 pages

Category
Computer Science:
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing