Towards global equity in political polarization research
By: Max Falkenberg , Matteo Cinelli , Alessandro Galeazzi and more
Potential Business Impact:
Shows how countries are divided, helps fix it.
With a folk understanding that political polarization refers to socio-political divisions within a society, many have proclaimed that we are more divided than ever. In this account, polarization has been blamed for populism, the erosion of social cohesion, the loss of trust in the institutions of democracy, legislative dysfunction, and the collective failure to address existential risks such as Covid-19 or climate change. However, at a global scale there is surprisingly little academic literature which conclusively supports these claims, with half of all studies being U.S.-focused. Here, we provide an overview of the global state of research on polarization, highlighting insights that are robust across countries, those unique to specific contexts, and key gaps in the literature. We argue that addressing these gaps is urgent, but has been hindered thus far by systemic and cultural barriers, such as regionally stratified restrictions on data access and misaligned research incentives. If continued cross-disciplinary inertia means that these disparities are left unaddressed, we see a substantial risk that countries will adopt policies to tackle polarization based on inappropriate evidence, risking flawed decision-making and the weakening of democratic institutions.
Similar Papers
Quantifying Polarization: A Comparative Study of Measures and Methods
Computers and Society
Finds how groups disagree online better.
Party Ideologies and Political Polarization-Driven Conflicts: A Study of the Global South
Physics and Society
Shows how fighting over beliefs causes wars.
A Flexible Measure of Voter Polarization
General Economics
Shows how voters split into groups over time.