Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis of aggregate data on clinical events
By: Christian Röver , Qiong Wu , Anja Loos and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps doctors find rare bad reactions to medicine.
To appreciate intervention effects on rare events, meta-analysis techniques are commonly applied in order to assess the accumulated evidence. When it comes to adverse effects in clinical trials, these are often most adequately handled using survival methods. A common-effect model that is able to process data in commonly quoted formats in terms of hazard ratios has been proposed for this purpose by Holzhauer (Stat. Med. 2017; 36(5):723-737). In order to accommodate potential heterogeneity between studies, we have extended the model by Holzhauer to a random-effects approach. The Bayesian model is described in detail, and applications to realistic data sets are discussed along with sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations to support the conclusions.
Similar Papers
Utilizing subgroup information in random-effects meta-analysis of few studies
Methodology
Improves medical study results with few data points.
Random-effects meta-analysis via generalized linear mixed models: A Bartlett-corrected approach for few studies
Methodology
Fixes math for combining study results.
Network Meta Analysis of Mean Survival
Applications
Helps doctors pick best medicine using survival data.