Navigating AI Policy Landscapes: Insights into Human Rights Considerations Across IEEE Regions
By: Angel Mary John, Jerrin Thomas Panachakel, Anusha S. P
Potential Business Impact:
Makes AI fair and safe for everyone.
This paper explores the integration of human rights considerations into AI regulatory frameworks across different IEEE regions - specifically the United States (Region 1-6), Europe (Region 8), China (part of Region 10), and Singapore (part of Region 10). While all acknowledge the transformative potential of AI and the necessity of ethical guidelines, their regulatory approaches significantly differ. Europe exhibits a rigorous framework with stringent protections for individual rights, while the U.S. promotes innovation with less restrictive regulations. China emphasizes state control and societal order in its AI strategies. In contrast, Singapore's advisory framework encourages self-regulation and aligns closely with international norms. This comparative analysis underlines the need for ongoing global dialogue to harmonize AI regulations that safeguard human rights while promoting technological advancement, reflecting the diverse perspectives and priorities of each region.
Similar Papers
Towards Adaptive AI Governance: Comparative Insights from the U.S., EU, and Asia
Computers and Society
Helps countries agree on AI rules.
Between Innovation and Oversight: A Cross-Regional Study of AI Risk Management Frameworks in the EU, U.S., UK, and China
Computers and Society
Helps countries make safe rules for smart computers.
Toward Responsible and Beneficial AI: Comparing Regulatory and Guidance-Based Approaches -A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Governance Frameworks across the European Union, United States, China, and IEEE
Computers and Society
Compares safe AI rules worldwide