Coevolution of Actions and Opinions in Networks of Coordinating and Anti-Coordinating Agents
By: Hong Liang , Mengbin Ye , Lorenzo Zino and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps groups agree or disagree on things.
In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of coordinating and anti-coordinating agents in a coevolutionary model for actions and opinions. In the model, the individuals of a population interact on a two-layer network, sharing their opinions and observing others' action, while revising their own opinions and actions according to a game-theoretic mechanism, grounded in the social psychology literature. First, we consider the scenario of coordinating agents, where convergence to a Nash equilibrium (NE) is guaranteed. We identify conditions for reaching consensus configurations and establish regions of attraction for these equilibria. Second, we study networks of anti-coordinating agents. In this second scenario, we prove that all trajectories converge to a NE by leveraging potential game theory. Then, we establish analytical conditions on the network structure and model parameters to guarantee the existence of consensus and polarized equilibria, characterizing their regions of attraction.
Similar Papers
On Signed Network Coordination Games
CS and Game Theory
Helps groups agree or split apart predictably.
Why do Opinions and Actions Diverge? A Dynamic Framework to Explore the Impact of Subjective Norms
Social and Information Networks
Shows how people act differently than they think.
Controlling a Social Network of Individuals with Coevolving Actions and Opinions
Systems and Control
Changes minds by adding stubborn people.