Silicon Sovereigns: Artificial Intelligence, International Law, and the Tech-Industrial Complex
By: Simon Chesterman
Potential Business Impact:
Few companies control AI, not governments.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping science, society, and power. Yet many debates over its likely impact remain fixated on extremes: utopian visions of universal benefit and dystopian fears of existential doom, or an arms race between the U.S. and China, or the Global North and Global South. What's missing is a serious conversation about distribution - who gains, who loses, and who decides. The global AI landscape is increasingly defined not just by geopolitical divides, but by the deepening imbalance between public governance and private control. As governments struggle to keep up, power is consolidating in the hands of a few tech firms whose influence now rivals that of states. If the twentieth century saw the rise of international institutions, the twenty-first may be witnessing their eclipse - replaced not by a new world order, but by a digital oligarchy. This essay explores what that shift means for international law, global equity, and the future of democratic oversight in an age of silicon sovereignty.
Similar Papers
Sovereign AI: Rethinking Autonomy in the Age of Global Interdependence
Computers and Society
Helps countries control AI without cutting it off.
Multilateralism in the Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Countries work together on AI rules.
Techno-Feudalism and the Rise of AGI: A Future Without Economic Rights?
General Economics
Gives everyone a share of AI's wealth.