Community Fact-Checks Do Not Break Follower Loyalty
By: Michelle Bobek, Nicolas Pröllochs
Potential Business Impact:
Fact checks don't make people unfollow spreaders.
Major social media platforms increasingly adopt community-based fact-checking to address misinformation on their platforms. While previous research has largely focused on its effect on engagement (e.g., reposts, likes), an understanding of how fact-checking affects a user's follower base is missing. In this study, we employ quasi-experimental methods to causally assess whether users lose followers after their posts are corrected via community fact-checks. Based on time-series data on follower counts for N=3516 community fact-checked posts from X, we find that community fact-checks do not lead to meaningful declines in the follower counts of users who post misleading content. This suggests that followers of spreaders of misleading posts tend to remain loyal and do not view community fact-checks as a sufficient reason to disengage. Our findings underscore the need for complementary interventions to more effectively disincentivize the production of misinformation on social media.
Similar Papers
References to unbiased sources increase the helpfulness of community fact-checks
Social and Information Networks
Makes online fact-checks more helpful with links.
Partisan Fact-Checkers' Warnings Can Effectively Correct Individuals' Misbeliefs About Political Misinformation
Human-Computer Interaction
Partisan fact-checkers help people believe less fake news.
Follow Nudges without Budges: A Field Experiment on Misinformation Followers Didn't Change Follow Networks
Social and Information Networks
Ads can't easily fix fake news online.