Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for Leaderless Blockchain Protocols
By: Pranav Garimidi, Lioba Heimbach, Tim Roughgarden
Potential Business Impact:
Makes blockchain fees fairer for everyone involved.
We initiate the study of transaction fee mechanism design for blockchain protocols in which multiple block producers contribute to the production of each block. Our contributions include: - We propose an extensive-form (multi-stage) game model to reason about the game theory of multi-proposer transaction fee mechanisms. - We define the strongly BPIC property to capture the idea that all block producers should be motivated to behave as intended: for every user bid profile, following the intended allocation rule is a Nash equilibrium for block producers that Pareto dominates all other Nash equilibria. - We propose the first-price auction with equal sharing (FPA-EQ) mechanism as an attractive solution to the multi-proposer transaction fee mechanism design problem. We prove that the mechanism is strongly BPIC and guarantees at least a 63.2% fraction of the maximum-possible expected welfare at equilibrium. - We prove that the compromises made by the FPA-EQ mechanism are qualitatively necessary: no strongly BPIC mechanism with non-trivial welfare guarantees can be DSIC, and no strongly BPIC mechanism can guarantee optimal welfare at equilibrium.
Similar Papers
Transaction Fee Market Design for Parallel Execution
CS and Game Theory
Makes blockchain faster by charging for data access.
Mechanism Design for Blockchain Order Books against Selfish Miners
CS and Game Theory
Makes online trading fairer for everyone.
Multiple Proposer Transaction Fee Mechanism Design: Robust Incentives Against Censorship and Bribery
CS and Game Theory
Rewards people for not blocking transactions.