A studentized permutation test for the treatment effect in individual participant data meta-analysis
By: Phuc Thien Tran , Long-Hao Xu , Christian Röver and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes combining study results more accurate.
Meta-analysis is a well-established tool used to combine data from several independent studies, each of which usually compares the effect of an experimental treatment with a control group. While meta-analyses are often performed using aggregated study summaries, they may also be conducted using individual participant data (IPD). Classical meta-analysis models may be generalized to handle continuous IPD by formulating them within a linear mixed model framework. IPD meta-analyses are commonly based on a small number of studies. Technically, inference for the overall treatment effect can be performed using Student-t approximation. However, as some approaches may not adequately control the type I error, Satterthwaite's or Kenward-Roger's method have been suggested to set the degrees-of-freedom parameter. The latter also adjusts the standard error of the treatment effect estimator. Nevertheless, these methods may be conservative. Since permutation tests are known to control the type I error and offer robustness to violations of distributional assumptions, we propose a studentized permutation test for the treatment effect based on permutations of standardized residuals across studies in IPD meta-analysis. Also, we construct confidence intervals for the treatment effect based on this test. The first interval is derived from the percentiles of the permutation distribution. The second interval is obtained by searching values closest to the effect estimate that are just significantly different from the true effect. In a simulation study, we demonstrate satisfactory performance of the proposed methods, often producing shorter confidence intervals compared with competitors.
Similar Papers
Quantifying inconsistency in one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses of treatment-covariate interactions: a simulation study
Methodology
Helps doctors trust combined study results more.
Integration of aggregated data in causally interpretable meta-analysis by inverse weighting
Methodology
Combines study data to find best treatments.
Testing Random Effects for Binomial Data
Statistics Theory
Helps scientists combine study results more accurately.