The Complexity of Correlated Equilibria in Generalized Games
By: Martino Bernasconi , Matteo Castiglioni , Andrea Celli and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes finding game winners harder for computers.
Correlated equilibria -- and their generalization $\Phi$-equilibria -- are a fundamental object of study in game theory, offering a more tractable alternative to Nash equilibria in multi-player settings. While computational aspects of equilibrium computation are well-understood in some settings, fundamental questions are still open in generalized games, that is, games in which the set of strategies allowed to each player depends on the other players' strategies. These classes of games model fundamental settings in economics and have been a cornerstone of economics research since the seminal paper of Arrow and Debreu [1954]. Recently, there has been growing interest, both in economics and in computer science, in studying correlated equilibria in generalized games. It is known that finding a social welfare maximizing correlated equilibrium in generalized games is NP-hard. However, the existence of efficient algorithms to find any equilibrium remains an important open question. In this paper, we answer this question negatively, showing that this problem is PPAD-complete.
Similar Papers
The Complexity of Pure Strategy Relevant Equilibria in Concurrent Games
CS and Game Theory
Finds fair game plans for smart computer players.
Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Computing (Coarse) Correlated Equilibria of General-Sum Games
Quantum Physics
Helps computers find fair outcomes in games.
Approximating Nash Equilibria in General-Sum Games via Meta-Learning
CS and Game Theory
Helps games find fair winning strategies faster.