Gromov-Wasserstein Bound between Reeb and Mapper Graphs
By: Ziyad Oulhaj, Mathieu Carrière, Bertrand Michel
Potential Business Impact:
Compares data maps using probability for better understanding.
Since its introduction as a computable approximation of the Reeb graph, the Mapper graph has become one of the most popular tools from topological data analysis for performing data visualization and inference. However, finding an appropriate metric (that is, a tractable metric with theoretical guarantees) for comparing Reeb and Mapper graphs, in order to, e.g., quantify the rate of convergence of the Mapper graph to the Reeb graph, is a difficult problem. While several metrics have been proposed in the literature, none is able to incorporate measure information, when data points are sampled according to an underlying probability measure. The resulting Reeb and Mapper graphs are therefore purely deterministic and combinatorial, and substantial effort is thus required to ensure their statistical validity. In this article, we handle this issue by treating Reeb and Mapper graphs as metric measure spaces. This allows us to use Gromov-Wasserstein metrics to compare these graphs directly in order to better incorporate the probability measures that data points are sampled from. Then, we describe the geometry that arises from this perspective, and we derive rates of convergence of the Mapper graph to the Reeb graph in this context. Finally, we showcase the usefulness of such metrics for Reeb and Mapper graphs in a few numerical experiments.
Similar Papers
Towards an Optimal Bound for the Interleaving Distance on Mapper Graphs
Computational Geometry
Helps computers understand data shapes better.
Reeb Graph of Sample Thickenings
Computational Geometry
Maps shapes from messy data.
Drawing Reeb Graphs
Computational Geometry
Makes complex data pictures easier to understand.