Integrating tumor burden with survival outcome for treatment effect evaluation in oncology trials
By: Saurabh Bhandari, Michael J. Daniels, Chenguang Wang
Potential Business Impact:
Find cancer treatments faster with less data.
In early-phase cancer clinical trials, the limited availability of data presents significant challenges in developing a framework to efficiently quantify treatment effectiveness. To address this, we propose a novel utility-based Bayesian approach for assessing treatment effects in these trials, where data scarcity is a major concern. Our approach synthesizes tumor burden, a key biomarker for evaluating patient response to oncology treatments, and survival outcome, a widely used endpoint for assessing clinical benefits, by jointly modeling longitudinal and survival data. The proposed method, along with its novel estimand, aims to efficiently capture signals of treatment efficacy in early-phase studies and holds potential for development as an endpoint in Phase 3 confirmatory studies. We conduct simulations to investigate the frequentist characteristics of the proposed estimand in a simple setting, which demonstrate relatively controlled Type I error rates when testing the treatment effect on outcomes.
Similar Papers
Using joint models in phase I dose-finding designs in oncology: considerations for frequentist approaches
Methodology
Finds safer cancer drug doses faster.
Nonparametric Bayesian Multi-Treatment Mixture Cure Survival Model with Application in Pediatric Oncology
Methodology
Finds best cancer treatment for each child.
Nonparametric Bayesian Multi-Treatment Mixture Cure Survival Model with Application in Pediatric Oncology
Methodology
Finds best cancer treatment for each child.