Local empirical Bayes correction for Bayesian modeling
By: Yoshiko Hayashi
Potential Business Impact:
Improves data analysis for huge science projects.
The James-Stein estimator has attracted much interest as a shrinkage estimator that yields better estimates than the maximum likelihood estimator. The James-Stein estimator is also very useful as an argument in favor of empirical Bayesian methods. However, for problems involving large-scale data, such as differential gene expression data, the distribution is considered a mixture distribution with different means that cannot be considered sufficiently close. Therefore, it is not appropriate to apply the James-Stein estimator. Efron (2011) proposed a local empirical Bayes correction that attempted to correct a selection bias for large-scale data.
Similar Papers
Robust local empirical Bayes correction for Bayesian modeling
Methodology
Fixes income data to show true earnings.
Empirical Bayes shrinkage (mostly) does not correct the measurement error in regression
Econometrics
Fixes math errors in studies better than old ways.
Stein's method of moment estimators for local dependency exponential random graph models
Statistics Theory
Makes computer models of networks faster.