Measuring What Matters: A Framework for Evaluating Safety Risks in Real-World LLM Applications
By: Jia Yi Goh , Shaun Khoo , Nyx Iskandar and more
Potential Business Impact:
Tests AI apps for safety before they're used.
Most safety testing efforts for large language models (LLMs) today focus on evaluating foundation models. However, there is a growing need to evaluate safety at the application level, as components such as system prompts, retrieval pipelines, and guardrails introduce additional factors that significantly influence the overall safety of LLM applications. In this paper, we introduce a practical framework for evaluating application-level safety in LLM systems, validated through real-world deployment across multiple use cases within our organization. The framework consists of two parts: (1) principles for developing customized safety risk taxonomies, and (2) practices for evaluating safety risks in LLM applications. We illustrate how the proposed framework was applied in our internal pilot, providing a reference point for organizations seeking to scale their safety testing efforts. This work aims to bridge the gap between theoretical concepts in AI safety and the operational realities of safeguarding LLM applications in practice, offering actionable guidance for safe and scalable deployment.
Similar Papers
The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs
Computation and Language
Makes AI safer by checking its bad ideas.
LLM-Safety Evaluations Lack Robustness
Cryptography and Security
Makes AI safer and easier to test.
LLMs and Childhood Safety: Identifying Risks and Proposing a Protection Framework for Safe Child-LLM Interaction
Computers and Society
Makes AI safe and fair for kids.