Testing Hypotheses from the Social Approval Theory of Online Hate: An Analysis of 110 Million Posts from Parler
By: David M. Markowitz, Samuel Hardman Taylor
Potential Business Impact:
Online hate isn't driven by likes, study finds.
In this paper, we explored how online hate is motivated by receiving social approval from others. We specifically examined two central tenets of Walther's (2024) social approval theory of online hate: (H1a) more signals of social approval on hate messages predicts more subsequent hate messages, and (H1b) as social approval increases, hate speech messages become more extreme. Using over 110 million posts from Parler (2018-2021), we observed that the number of upvotes a person received on a hate speech post was unassociated with the amount of hate speech in their next post and posts during the next week, month, three months, and six months. Between-person effects revealed an average negative relationship between social approval and hate speech production at the post level, but this relationship was mixed at other time intervals. Social approval reinforcement mechanisms of online hate may operate differently on niche social media platforms.
Similar Papers
Celebrity messages reduce online hate and limit its spread
Social and Information Networks
Stops online hate with celebrity videos.
Social bias is prevalent in user reports of hate and abuse online
Computers and Society
People flag hate more when it targets their own group.
Modelling the Spread of Toxicity and Exploring its Mitigation on Online Social Networks
Social and Information Networks
Bots reduce online hate speech by changing its message.