Freshness, Persistence and Success of Scientific Teams
By: Hanjo D. Boekhout , Eelke M. Heemskerk , Niccolò Pisani and more
Potential Business Impact:
New teams make science better than old ones.
Team science dominates scientific knowledge production, but what makes academic teams successful? Using temporal data on 25.2 million publications and 31.8 million authors, we propose a novel network-driven approach to identify and study the success of persistent teams. Challenging the idea that persistence alone drives success, we find that team freshness - new collaborations built on prior experience - is key to success. High impact research tends to emerge early in a team's lifespan. Analyzing complex team overlap, we find that teams open to new collaborative ties consistently produce better science. Specifically, team re-combinations that introduce new freshness impulses sustain success, while persistence impulses from experienced teams are linked to earlier impact. Together, freshness and persistence shape team success across collaboration stages.
Similar Papers
The Intertwined Rise of Collaboration Scale, Reference Diversity, and Breakthrough Potential in Modern Science: A 40-Year Cross-Disciplinary Study
Digital Libraries
More ideas mixed together make bigger discoveries.
Beginner's Charm: Beginner-Heavy Teams Are Associated With High Scientific Disruption
Digital Libraries
New scientists make science more surprising and new.
Synergy, not size: How collaboration architecture shapes scientific disruption
Digital Libraries
Finds best ways for scientists to work together.