Compatibility of Max and Sum Objectives for Committee Selection and $k$-Facility Location
By: Yue Han, Elliot Anshelevich
Potential Business Impact:
Finds best spots for services, good for many needs.
We study a version of the metric facility location problem (or, equivalently, variants of the committee selection problem) in which we must choose $k$ facilities in an arbitrary metric space to serve some set of clients $C$. We consider four different objectives, where each client $i\in C$ attempts to minimize either the sum or the maximum of its distance to the chosen facilities, and where the overall objective either considers the sum or the maximum of the individual client costs. Rather than optimizing a single objective at a time, we study how compatible these objectives are with each other, and show the existence of solutions which are simultaneously close-to-optimum for any pair of the above objectives. Our results show that when choosing a set of facilities or a representative committee, it is often possible to form a solution which is good for several objectives at the same time, instead of sacrificing one desideratum to achieve another.
Similar Papers
Low Cost, Fair, and Representative Committees in a Metric Space
CS and Game Theory
Finds fair groups that are close to everyone.
Facility Location Games for Multi-Location Agents with Satisfaction
CS and Game Theory
Helps decide best spot for things people want.
Constrained Distributed Heterogeneous Two-Facility Location Problems with Max-Variant Cost
CS and Game Theory
Helps groups pick best spots for two shared services.