Deciding how to respond: A deliberative framework to guide policymaker responses to AI systems
By: Willem Fourie
Potential Business Impact:
Focuses AI rules on good things, not just bad.
The discourse on responsible artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is understandably dominated by risk-focused assessments and analyses. This approach reflects the fundamental uncertainty policymakers face when determining appropriate responses to current, emerging and novel AI systems. In this article, we argue that by operationalising the concept of freedom - the philosophical counterpart to responsibility - a complementary approach centred on the potential societal benefits of AI systems can be developed. The result is a discursive framework grounded in freedom as capability and freedom as opportunity, which represent the two main intellectual traditions of interpreting freedom. We contend that the complexity, ambiguity and contestation involved in regulating AI systems make a deliberative paradigm more useful than the conventional technical one. The resulting framework is structured around coordinative, communicative and decision spaces, each with sequential focal points and associated outputs.
Similar Papers
Beyond risk: A proto-framework for assessing the societal impact of AI systems
Computers and Society
Measures how AI affects people's freedom.
Beyond risk: A proto-framework for assessing the societal impact of AI systems
Computers and Society
Measures how AI affects people's freedom.
Normative Moral Pluralism for AI: A Framework for Deliberation in Complex Moral Contexts
Computers and Society
Teaches computers to make fair, thoughtful choices.