The shape of economics before and after the financial crisis
By: Alberto Baccini, Lucio Barabesi, Carlo Debernardi
Potential Business Impact:
Shows how money problems didn't change how science works.
This paper investigates the impact of the global financial crisis on the shape of economics as a discipline by analyzing EconLit-indexed journals from 2006 to 2020 using a multilayer network approach. We consider two types of social relationships among journals, based on shared editors (interlocking editorship) and shared authors (interlocking authorship), as well as two forms of intellectual proximity, derived from bibliographic coupling and textual similarity. These four dimensions are integrated using Similarity Network Fusion to produce a unified similarity network from which journal communities are identified. Comparing the field in 2006, 2012, and 2019 reveals a high degree of structural continuity. Our findings suggest that, despite changes in research topics after the crisis, fundamental social and intellectual relationships among journals have remained remarkably stable. Editorial networks, in particular, continue to shape hierarchies and legitimize knowledge production.
Similar Papers
A Stock-Flow Framework for Editorial Board Dynamics: The Case of Economics Journals, 1866-2019
Digital Libraries
Shows how science groups change over time.
Dynamic Spatial Treatment Effects and Network Fragility: Theory and Evidence from the 2008 Financial Crisis
Risk Management
Makes banks safer by understanding how they're linked.
General Equilibrium Amplification and Crisis Vulnerability: Cross-Crisis Evidence from Global Banks
Econometrics
Finds how bank problems spread to others.