Virtual Trading in Multi-Settlement Electricity Markets
By: Agostino Capponi , Garud Iyengar , Bo Yang and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes electricity prices fairer by spotting fake trades.
In the Day-Ahead (DA) market, suppliers sell and load-serving entities (LSEs) purchase energy commitments, with both sides adjusting for imbalances between contracted and actual deliveries in the Real-Time (RT) market. We develop a supply function equilibrium model to study how virtual trading-speculating on DA-RT price spreads without physical delivery-affects market efficiency. Without virtual trading, LSEs underbid relative to actual demand in the DA market, pushing DA prices below expected RT prices. Virtual trading narrows, and in the limit of large number traders can eliminates, this price gap. However, it does not induce quantity alignment: DA-cleared demand remains below true expected demand, as price alignment makes the LSE indifferent between markets and prompts it to reduce DA bids to avoid over-purchasing. Renewable energy suppliers cannot offset these strategic distortions. We provide empirical support to our main model implications using data from the California and New York Independent System Operators.
Similar Papers
Trading Electrons: Predicting DART Spread Spikes in ISO Electricity Markets
Trading & Market Microstructure
Helps sell electricity for more money.
Leveraging Asynchronous Cross-border Market Data for Improved Day-Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting in European Markets
Machine Learning (CS)
Predicts electricity prices better using other markets.
A Linear Pricing Mechanism for Load Management in Day-Ahead Retail Energy Markets
Systems and Control
Makes electricity prices guide usage, avoiding grid jams.