Matching-Based Nonparametric Estimation of Group Average Treatment Effects
By: Peng Wu , Pengtao Zeng , Zhaoqing Tian and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps doctors give best treatment to different people.
Heterogeneous treatment effects, which vary according to individual covariates, are crucial in fields such as personalized medicine and tailored treatment strategies. In many applications, rather than considering the heterogeneity induced by all covariates, practitioners focus on a few key covariates to develop tailored treatment decisions. Based on this, we aim to estimate the group average treatment effects (GATEs), which represent heterogeneous treatment effects across subpopulations defined by certain key covariates. Previous strategies for estimating GATEs, such as weighting-based and regression-based methods, suffer from instability or extrapolation bias, especially when several propensity scores are close to zero or one. To address these limitations, we propose two novel nonparametric estimation methods: a matching-based method and a bias-corrected matching method for estimating GATEs. The matching-based method imputes potential outcomes using a matching technique, followed by a nonparametric regression. This method avoids the instability caused by extreme propensity scores but may introduce non-negligible bias when the dimension of full covariates is high. To mitigate this, the bias-corrected matching estimator incorporates additional outcome regression models, enhancing robustness and reducing bias. We show the consistency, double robustness, and asymptotic normality of the bias-corrected matching estimator. We empirically demonstrate the advantages of the proposed methods with extensive simulation studies and a real-world application. An open-source R package, MatchGATE, is available to implement the proposed methods.
Similar Papers
Estimation and Inference for the Average Treatment Effect in a Score-Explained Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Model
Methodology
Helps measure fairness when aid is given.
Exact matching as an alternative to propensity score matching
Methodology
Makes medical study results fairer and more accurate.
Multiply Robust Inference of Average Treatment Effects by High-dimensional Empirical Likelihood
Methodology
Helps doctors find best treatment for patients.