Does Extending Polling Hours Compensate for Bomb Threats? Evidence from the 2024 Election in Georgia, USA
By: Sequoia Andrade, Philip Stark
Potential Business Impact:
Bomb threats hurt voting in some places.
At least 227~bomb threats against polling places and tabulation centers were received on the day of the 2024 US presidential election. Threats disrupted voting in the swing states of Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania while law enforcement swept polling places. No bombs were found. Roughly a dozen `credible' threats were received in Georgia in DeKalb and Fulton counties, interrupting voting at eleven polling locations; there were dozens of `non-credible' threats in addition. To remediate the effect of the temporary closures of polling places, courts ordered some polling places to remain open late. Nonparametric statistical tests using turnout data from 2020 and 2024 show that this remedy may have been inadequate: in DeKalb, 2024 in-person turnout in precincts closed by threats relative to 2020 turnout in the same precincts was suppressed compared to other DeKalb polling places ($P \approx 0.01$). In Fulton, there is no statistical evidence that in-person voting was suppressed in precincts closed by bomb threats.
Similar Papers
Overcoming Bottlenecks in Homomorphic Encryption for the 2024 Mexican Federal Election
Cryptography and Security
Lets Mexicans vote online from anywhere securely.
The Electoral Consequences of Natural Disasters: A Dynamic Fixed-Effects Analysis
General Economics
Disasters near elections help mayors win votes.
Election and Subjective Well-Being:Evidence from the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
General Economics
Election results hurt some people's happiness.