Stairway to Fairness: Connecting Group and Individual Fairness
By: Theresia Veronika Rampisela , Maria Maistro , Tuukka Ruotsalo and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes online suggestions fair for everyone.
Fairness in recommender systems (RSs) is commonly categorised into group fairness and individual fairness. However, there is no established scientific understanding of the relationship between the two fairness types, as prior work on both types has used different evaluation measures or evaluation objectives for each fairness type, thereby not allowing for a proper comparison of the two. As a result, it is currently not known how increasing one type of fairness may affect the other. To fill this gap, we study the relationship of group and individual fairness through a comprehensive comparison of evaluation measures that can be used for both fairness types. Our experiments with 8 runs across 3 datasets show that recommendations that are highly fair for groups can be very unfair for individuals. Our finding is novel and useful for RS practitioners aiming to improve the fairness of their systems. Our code is available at: https://github.com/theresiavr/stairway-to-fairness.
Similar Papers
The Order of Recommendation Matters: Structured Exploration for Improving the Fairness of Content Creators
Computers and Society
Makes social media pay creators more fairly.
Regret-aware Re-ranking for Guaranteeing Two-sided Fairness and Accuracy in Recommender Systems
Information Retrieval
Makes online suggestions fairer for everyone.
Fairness Perceptions in Regression-based Predictive Models
Human-Computer Interaction
Makes organ transplants fairer for everyone.