Gender Differences in Healthcare Utilisation - Evidence from Unexpected Adverse Health Shocks
By: Nadja van 't Hoff, Giovanni Mellace, Seetha Menon
Potential Business Impact:
Men use more healthcare than women.
This paper is the first to provide causal evidence of gender differences in healthcare utilisation to better understand the male-female health-survival paradox, where women live longer but experience worse health outcomes. Using rich Danish administrative healthcare data, we apply a staggered difference-in-differences approach that exploits the randomness in treatment timing to estimate the causal impact of adverse health shocks, such as non-fatal heart attacks or strokes, on healthcare use. Our findings suggest that men consistently use more healthcare than women, highlighting the underlying factors driving gender disparities in health outcomes. These insights contribute to the broader discourse on healthcare equity and inform policy interventions aimed at addressing these imbalances.
Similar Papers
Too Sick for Working, or Sick of Working? Impact of Acute Health Shocks on Early Labour Market Exits
General Economics
Health problems make older people stop working early.
Unmasking inequility: socio-economic determinants and gender disparities in Maharashtra and India's health outcomes -- Insights from NFHS-5
General Economics
Finds why some people get sicker than others.
Who gets hit first and who recovers last? Evidence from Indian Coastal Flood Shock
econ.GN
Floods hurt women's jobs more than men's.