Selecting Interlacing Committees
By: Chris Dong , Martin Bullinger , Tomasz WΔ s and more
Potential Business Impact:
Helps groups pick leaders who unite, not divide.
Polarization is a major concern for a well-functioning society. Often, mass polarization of a society is driven by polarizing political representation, even when the latter is easily preventable. The existing computational social choice methods for the task of committee selection are not designed to address this issue. We enrich the standard approach to committee selection by defining two quantitative measures that evaluate how well a given committee interconnects the voters. Maximizing these measures aims at avoiding polarizing committees. While the corresponding maximization problems are NP-complete in general, we obtain efficient algorithms for profiles in the voter-candidate interval domain. Moreover, we analyze the compatibility of our goals with other representation objectives, such as excellence, diversity, and proportionality. We identify trade-offs between approximation guarantees, and describe algorithms that achieve simultaneous constant-factor approximations.
Similar Papers
Computing Equilibrium Nominations in Presidential Elections
CS and Game Theory
Helps political parties pick winners more fairly.
Polarization by Design: How Elites Could Shape Mass Preferences as AI Reduces Persuasion Costs
General Economics
AI helps leaders change people's minds to win votes.
Understanding the Impact of Proportionality in Approval-Based Multiwinner Elections
CS and Game Theory
Helps pick fairer voting groups for elections.