Authorship-contribution normalized Sh-index and citations are better research output indicators
By: Vishvesh Karthik , Indupalli Sishir Anand , Utkarsha Mahanta and more
Potential Business Impact:
Shows who really did the most work in research.
Bibliometric measures, such as total citations and h-index, have become a cornerstone for evaluating academic performance; however, these traditional metrics, being non-weighted, inadequately capture the nuances of individual contributions. To address this constraint, we developed GScholarLens, an open-access browser extension that integrates seamlessly with Google Scholar to enable detailed bibliometric analysis. GScholarLens categorizes publications by authorship roles, adjusts citation weightings accordingly, and introduces Scholar h-index, Sh-index, an authorship-contribution normalized h-index. This tool proportionally weights citations based on authorship position using heuristic percentages, i.e., corresponding 100 percent, first 90 percent, second 50 percent, co-authors in publications with less than six authors 25 percent, and co-authors with more than six authors 10 percent. Currently, there is no empirical data available for author-contribution weights, however, this proof-of-concept framework can easily adapt more precise author-contribution weightage data decided by authors at the time of manuscript submission along with CRediT, which journals and publishers can mandate. Furthermore, this tool incorporates retraction detection by mapping data from retraction databases into the Google Scholar interface. By aligning bibliometric evaluation more closely with actual scholarly contribution, GScholarLens presents a better open-access framework for academic recognition, particularly within interdisciplinary and highly collaborative research environments. This tool is freely accessible at https://project.iith.ac.in/sharmaglab/gscholarlens/.
Similar Papers
Research impact evaluation based on effective authorship contribution sensitivity: h-leadership index
Digital Libraries
Fairly judges scientists' work in big teams.
When a Paper Has 1000 Authors: Rethinking Citation Metrics in the Era of LLMs
Digital Libraries
Find top scientists in huge research papers.
The Community Index: A More Comprehensive Approach to Assessing Scholarly Impact
Digital Libraries
Measures research impact better by valuing diverse teams.