Mechanics-Informed Machine Learning for Geospatial Modeling of Soil Liquefaction: Global and National Surrogate Models for Simulation and Near-Real-Time Response
By: Morgan D. Sanger, Mertcan Geyin, Brett W. Maurer
Potential Business Impact:
Predicts earthquake damage to the ground.
Using machine learning (ML), high performance computing, and a large body of geospatial information, we develop surrogate models to predict soil liquefaction across regional scales. Two sets of models - one global and one specific to New Zealand - are trained by learning to mimic geotechnical models at the sites of in-situ tests. Our geospatial approach has conceptual advantages in that predictions: (i) are anchored to mechanics, which encourages more sensible response and scaling across the domains of soil, site, and loading characteristics; (ii) are driven by ML, which allows more predictive information to be used, with greater potential for it to be exploited; (iii) are geostatistically updated by subsurface data, which anchors the predictions to known conditions; and (iv) are precomputed everywhere on earth for all conceivable earthquakes, which allows the models to be executed very easily, thus encouraging user adoption and evaluation. Test applications suggest that: (i) the proposed models outperform others to a statistically significant degree; (ii) the geostatistical updating further improves performance; and (iii) the anticipated advantages of region-specific models may largely be negated by the benefits of learning from larger global datasets. These models are best suited for regional-scale liquefaction hazard simulation and near-real-time response and are accompanied by variance products that convey where, and to what degree, the ML-predicted liquefaction response is influenced by local geotechnical data.
Similar Papers
Geospatial AI for Liquefaction Hazard and Impact Forecasting: A Demonstrative Study in the U.S. Pacific Northwest
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Maps earthquake shaking danger to save lives.
Why "AI" Models for Predicting Soil Liquefaction have been Ignored, Plus Some that Shouldn't Be
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Makes earthquake predictions more accurate.
Landslide Hazard Mapping with Geospatial Foundation Models: Geographical Generalizability, Data Scarcity, and Band Adaptability
CV and Pattern Recognition
Maps landslides better, even with less data.