Comparison of Hyperplane Rounding for Max-Cut and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm over Certain Regular Graph Families
By: Reuben Tate, Swati Gupta
Potential Business Impact:
Finds hard math problems for quantum computers.
There is a strong interest in finding challenging instances of NP-hard problems, from the perspective of showing quantum advantage. Due to the limits of near-term NISQ devices, it is moreover useful if these instances are small. In this work, we identify two graph families ($|V|<1000$) on which the Goemans-Williamson algorithm for approximating the Max-Cut achieves at most a 0.912-approximation. We further show that, in comparison, a recent quantum algorithm, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (depth $p=1$), is a 0.592-approximation on Karloff instances in the limit ($n \to \infty$), and is at best a $0.894$-approximation on a family of strongly-regular graphs. We further explore construction of challenging instances computationally by perturbing edge weights, which may be of independent interest, and include these in the CI-QuBe github repository.
Similar Papers
Quantum Max-Cut is NP hard to approximate
quant-ph
Proves hard to find best way to cut quantum networks.
A Hardware Accelerator for the Goemans-Williamson Algorithm
Hardware Architecture
Makes computers solve hard problems faster.
Reinforced Generation of Combinatorial Structures: Applications to Complexity Theory
Machine Learning (CS)
AI finds harder math problems for computers.