Capital Games and Growth Equilibria
By: Ben Abramowitz
Potential Business Impact:
Players' choices create game rules and winning strategies.
We examine formal games that we call "capital games" in which player payoffs are known, but their payoffs are not guaranteed to be von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities. In capital games, the dynamics of player payoffs determine their utility functions. Different players can have different payoff dynamics. We make no assumptions about where these dynamics come from, but implicitly assume that they come from the players' actions and interactions over time. We define an equilibrium concept called "growth equilibrium" and show a correspondence between the growth equilibria of capital games and the Nash equilibria of standard games.
Similar Papers
Mean Field Portfolio Games with Epstein-Zin Preferences
Mathematical Finance
Finds best ways to invest money for the future.
A choice-based axiomatization of Nash equilibrium
Theoretical Economics
Finds the best choices for players in games.
Robust equilibria in continuous games: From strategic to dynamic robustness
CS and Game Theory
Makes game predictions reliable even with changing rules.