Financial Stability Implications of Generative AI: Taming the Animal Spirits
By: Anne Lundgaard Hansen, Seung Jung Lee
Potential Business Impact:
AI trading stops some money bubbles, but can cause others.
This paper investigates the impact of the adoption of generative AI on financial stability. We conduct laboratory-style experiments using large language models to replicate classic studies on herd behavior in trading decisions. Our results show that AI agents make more rational decisions than humans, relying predominantly on private information over market trends. Increased reliance on AI-powered trading advice could therefore potentially lead to fewer asset price bubbles arising from animal spirits that trade by following the herd. However, exploring variations in the experimental settings reveals that AI agents can be induced to herd optimally when explicitly guided to make profit-maximizing decisions. While optimal herding improves market discipline, this behavior still carries potential implications for financial stability. In other experimental variations, we show that AI agents are not purely algorithmic, but have inherited some elements of human conditioning and bias.
Similar Papers
How AI Agents Follow the Herd of AI? Network Effects, History, and Machine Optimism
Multiagent Systems
AI learns to play games by watching past moves.
Can Generative AI agents behave like humans? Evidence from laboratory market experiments
General Economics
Computers can now act like people in money games.
My Advisor, Her AI and Me: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Human-AI Collaboration and Investment Decisions
General Economics
Humans help people trust and use AI money advice.