The Optimal Magnitude of Government Spending: Evidence from Cambodia
By: Leanghak Hok, Zoltan Bartha
Potential Business Impact:
Government spending helps growth, but too much hurts it.
Scholars and policymakers have vigorously debated what the impact of government spending on economic growth is. Some current research and theoretical models suggest that the reaction of economic growth to the extension of government spending can be either positive or negative. This article intends to investigate the inverted-U shaped relationship between output growth and government spending (i.e., government fixed capital formation [GFCF] and government final consumption expenditure [GFCE]). Ordinary least squares (OLS) is employed as an approach to annual data for Cambodia obtained from 1971 to 2015. The result reveals that GFCF and GFCE have an inverted-U shaped relation with economic growth and that 5.40% and 7.23% are the optimal values of GFCF and GFCE, respectively. The labour growth rate and export growth rate contribute positively to the growth rate of output. This study indicates that the increasing level of government expenditure reduces the efficacy of government spending, and also helps Cambodia's policymakers to control fiscal policy more efficiently.
Similar Papers
GDP-GFCF Dynamics Across Global Economies: A Comparative Study of Panel Regressions and Random Forest
General Economics
Shows how money spent builds economies better.
The Impact Of Industrial Production On Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence For Turkiye In A Material Development Framework
General Economics
Manufacturing helps Turkey's economy grow most.
Do Governments React to Public Debt Accumulation? A Cross-Country Analysis
General Economics
Governments fix budgets when debt gets too high.