Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences
By: Dragan Filimonovic, Christian Rutzer, Conny Wunsch
Potential Business Impact:
Helps scientists write more and better papers.
This paper estimates the effect of Generative AI (GenAI) adoption on scientific productivity and quality in the social and behavioral sciences. Using matched author-level panel data and a difference-in-differences design, we find that GenAI adoption is associated with sizable increases in research productivity, measured by the number of published papers. It also leads to moderate gains in publication quality, based on journal impact factors. These effects are most pronounced among early-career researchers, authors working in technically complex subfields, and those from non-English-speaking countries. The results suggest that GenAI tools may help lower some structural barriers in academic publishing and promote more inclusive participation in research.
Similar Papers
Developer Productivity with GenAI
Software Engineering
AI helps coders work faster, not better.
Generative AI in Sociological Research: State of the Discipline
Computers and Society
Helps scientists use AI for writing, but worries about it.
Generative AI and Firm Productivity: Field Experiments in Online Retail
General Economics
Helps online stores sell more products.