Barriers that Programming Instructors Face While Performing Emergency Pedagogical Design to Shape Student-AI Interactions with Generative AI Tools
By: Sam Lau , Kianoosh Boroojeni , Harry Keeling and more
Potential Business Impact:
Teachers learn to help students use AI wisely.
Generative AI (GenAI) tools are increasingly pervasive, pushing instructors to redesign how students use GenAI tools in coursework. We conceptualize this work as emergency pedagogical design: reactive, indirect efforts by instructors to shape student-AI interactions without control over commercial interfaces. To understand practices of lead users conducting emergency pedagogical design, we conducted interviews (n=13) and a survey (n=169) of computing instructors. These instructors repeatedly encountered five barriers: fragmented buy-in for revising courses; policy crosswinds from non-prescriptive institutional guidance; implementation challenges as instructors attempt interventions; assessment misfit as student-AI interactions are only partially visible to instructors; and lack of resources, including time, staffing, and paid tool access. We use these findings to present emergency pedagogical design as a distinct design setting for HCI and outline recommendations for HCI researchers, academic institutions, and organizations to effectively support instructors in adapting courses to GenAI.
Similar Papers
Bridging the AI Adoption Gap: Designing an Interactive Pedagogical Agent for Higher Education Instructors
Human-Computer Interaction
Helps teachers use AI to teach better.
Relief or displacement? How teachers are negotiating generative AI's role in their professional practice
Human-Computer Interaction
Helps teachers use AI fairly in schools.
Evaluating the AI-Lab Intervention: Impact on Student Perception and Use of Generative AI in Early Undergraduate Computer Science Courses
Computers and Society
Teaches students to use AI wisely for learning.