Quantum and Classical Machine Learning in Decentralized Finance: Comparative Evidence from Multi-Asset Backtesting of Automated Market Makers
By: Chi-Sheng Chen, Aidan Hung-Wen Tsai
Potential Business Impact:
Quantum computers help make more money trading crypto.
This study presents a comprehensive empirical comparison between quantum machine learning (QML) and classical machine learning (CML) approaches in Automated Market Makers (AMM) and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) trading strategies through extensive backtesting on 10 models across multiple cryptocurrency assets. Our analysis encompasses classical ML models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression), pure quantum models (VQE Classifier, QNN, QSVM), hybrid quantum-classical models (QASA Hybrid, QASA Sequence, QuantumRWKV), and transformer models. The results demonstrate that hybrid quantum models achieve superior overall performance with 11.2\% average return and 1.42 average Sharpe ratio, while classical ML models show 9.8\% average return and 1.47 average Sharpe ratio. The QASA Sequence hybrid model achieves the highest individual return of 13.99\% with the best Sharpe ratio of 1.76, demonstrating the potential of quantum-classical hybrid approaches in AMM and DeFi trading strategies.
Similar Papers
Towards Quantum Machine Learning for Malicious Code Analysis
Machine Learning (CS)
Finds computer viruses faster and better.
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Neural Networks for Few-Shot Credit Risk Assessment
Machine Learning (CS)
Helps banks decide who to lend money to.
Benchmarking Classical and Quantum Models for DeFi Yield Prediction on Curve Finance
Statistical Finance
Helps predict money growth in online banks.