Typing Strictness (Extended Version)
By: Daniel Sainati , Joseph W. Cutler , Benjamin C. Pierce and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes computer programs run faster by understanding how they use info.
Strictness analysis is critical to efficient implementation of languages with non-strict evaluation, mitigating much of the performance overhead of laziness. However, reasoning about strictness at the source level can be challenging and unintuitive. We propose a new definition of strictness that refines the traditional one by describing variable usage more precisely. We lay type-theoretic foundations for this definition in both call-by-name and call-by-push-value settings, drawing inspiration from the literature on type systems tracking effects and coeffects. We prove via a logical relation that the strictness attributes computed by our type systems accurately describe the use of variables at runtime, and we offer a strictness-annotation-preserving translation from the call-by-name system to the call-by-push-value one. All our results are mechanized in Rocq.
Similar Papers
Type, Ability, and Effect Systems: Perspectives on Purity, Semantics, and Expressiveness
Programming Languages
Makes computer programs safer and easier to write.
Don't exhaust, don't waste
Programming Languages
Prevents computer programs from wasting resources.
Type-Based Incorrectness Reasoning
Programming Languages
Finds bugs in computer programs automatically.