Efficient recognition algorithms for $(1,2)$-, $(2,1)$- and $(2,2)$-graphs
By: Flavia Bonomo-Braberman, Min Chih Lin, Ignacio Maqueda
Potential Business Impact:
Makes computers sort special pictures faster.
A graph $G$ is said to be a $(k,\ell)$-graph if its vertex set can be partitioned into $k$ independent sets and $\ell$ cliques. It is well established that the recognition problem for $(k,\ell)$-graphs is NP-complete whenever $k \geq 3$ or $\ell \geq 3$, while it is solvable in polynomial time otherwise. In particular, for the case $k+\ell \leq 2$, recognition can be carried out in linear time, since split graphs coincide with the class of $(1,1)$-graphs, bipartite graphs correspond precisely to $(2,0)$-graphs, and $(\ell,k)$-graphs are the complements of $(k,\ell)$-graphs. Recognition algorithms for $(2,1)$- and $(1,2)$-graphs were provided by Brandst\"adt, Le and Szymczak in 1998, while the case of $(2,2)$-graphs was addressed by Feder, Hell, Klein, and Motwani in 1999. In this work, we refine these results by presenting improved recognition algorithms with lower time complexity. Specifically, we reduce the running time from $O((n+m)^2)$ to $O(n^2+nm)$ for $(2,1)$-graphs, from $O((n+\overline{m})^2)$ to $O(n^2+n\overline{m})$ for $(1,2)$-graphs, and from $O(n^{10}(n+m))$ to $O(n^4 (n+\min\{m,\overline{m}\})^3)$ for $(2,2)$-graphs. Here, $n$ and $m$ denote the number of vertices and edges of the input graph $G$, respectively, and $\overline{m}$ denotes the number of edges in the complement of $G$.
Similar Papers
Algorithms and Hardness Results for the $(k,\ell)$-Cover Problem
Data Structures and Algorithms
Finds fewest missing connections to make groups.
Efficient Algorithms and Implementations for Extracting Maximum-Size $(k,\ell)$-Sparse Subgraphs
Data Structures and Algorithms
Finds best connections in complex networks faster.
Fine-Grained Classification Of Detecting Dominating Patterns
Data Structures and Algorithms
Finds specific shapes within complex networks.