Foundation Model Forecasts: Form and Function
By: Alvaro Perez-Diaz , James C. Loach , Danielle E. Toutoungi and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes weather forecasts useful for planning trips.
Time-series foundation models (TSFMs) achieve strong forecast accuracy, yet accuracy alone does not determine practical value. The form of a forecast -- point, quantile, parametric, or trajectory ensemble -- fundamentally constrains which operational tasks it can support. We survey recent TSFMs and find that two-thirds produce only point or parametric forecasts, while many operational tasks require trajectory ensembles that preserve temporal dependence. We establish when forecast types can be converted and when they cannot: trajectory ensembles convert to simpler forms via marginalization without additional assumptions, but the reverse requires imposing temporal dependence through copulas or conformal methods. We prove that marginals cannot determine path-dependent event probabilities -- infinitely many joint distributions share identical marginals but yield different answers to operational questions. We map six fundamental forecasting tasks to minimal sufficient forecast types and provide a task-aligned evaluation framework. Our analysis clarifies when forecast type, not accuracy, differentiates practical utility.
Similar Papers
Time Series Foundation Models: Benchmarking Challenges and Requirements
Machine Learning (CS)
Tests if future predictions are truly new.
Re(Visiting) Time Series Foundation Models in Finance
Computational Finance
Teaches computers to predict stock prices better.
Enhancing Transformer-Based Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting via Bagging, Boosting and Statistical Ensembles
Machine Learning (CS)
Makes computer predictions of future events more accurate.