Relative-error unateness testing
By: Xi Chen , Diptaksho Palit , Kabir Peshawaria and more
Potential Business Impact:
Finds if a computer program always goes up or down.
The model of relative-error property testing of Boolean functions has been the subject of significant recent research effort [CDH+24][CPPS25a][CPPS25b] In this paper we consider the problem of relative-error testing an unknown and arbitrary $f: \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ for the property of being a unate function, i.e. a function that is either monotone non-increasing or monotone non-decreasing in each of the $n$ input variables. Our first result is a one-sided non-adaptive algorithm for this problem that makes $\tilde{O}(\log(N)/\epsilon)$ samples and queries, where $N=|f^{-1}(1)|$ is the number of satisfying assignments of the function that is being tested and the value of $N$ is given as an input parameter to the algorithm. Building on this algorithm, we next give a one-sided adaptive algorithm for this problem that does not need to be given the value of $N$ and with high probability makes $\tilde{O}(\log(N)/\epsilon)$ samples and queries. We also give lower bounds for both adaptive and non-adaptive two-sided algorithms that are given the value of $N$ up to a constant multiplicative factor. In the non-adaptive case, our lower bounds essentially match the complexity of the algorithm that we provide.
Similar Papers
Halfspaces are hard to test with relative error
Computational Complexity
Makes testing simple computer programs harder.
Relative-error testing of conjunctions and decision lists
Computational Complexity
Tests if computer programs are simple or complex.
Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) $n^{1/2}$ queries
Computational Complexity
Finds if a computer program is always fair.