10 Simple Rules for Improving Your Standardized Fields and Terms
By: Rhiannon Cameron , Emma Griffiths , Damion Dooley and more
Potential Business Impact:
Makes research data easier to find and use.
Contextual metadata is the unsung hero of research data. When done right, standardized and structured vocabularies make your data findable, shareable, and reusable. When done wrong, they turn a well intended effort into data cleanup and curation nightmares. In this paper we tackle the surprisingly tricky process of vocabulary standardization with a mix of practical advice and grounded examples. Drawing from real-world experience in contextual data harmonization, we highlight common challenges (e.g., semantic noise and concept bombs) and provide actionable strategies to address them. Our rules emphasize alignment with Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability (FAIR) principles while remaining adaptable to evolving user and research needs. Whether you are curating datasets, designing a schema, or contributing to a standards body, these rules aim to help you create metadata that is not only technically sound but also meaningful to users.
Similar Papers
Knowledge engineering for open science: Building and deploying knowledge bases for metadata standards
Digital Libraries
Helps scientists share data so others can use it.
Smart Metadata in Action: The Social Impact Data Commons
Computers and Society
Makes important data easy to find and use.
Enhancing Information Retrieval in Digital Libraries through Unit Harmonisation in Scholarly Knowledge Graphs
Digital Libraries
Finds and compares science data across studies.