Beliefs about Bots: How Employers Plan for AI in White-Collar Work
By: Eduard Brüll, Samuel Mäurer, Davud Rostam-Afschar
Potential Business Impact:
Bosses think jobs are safer than they are.
We provide experimental evidence on how employers adjust expectations to automation risk in high-skill, white-collar work. Using a randomized information intervention among tax advisors in Germany, we show that firms systematically underestimate automatability. Information provision raises risk perceptions, especially for routine-intensive roles. Yet, it leaves short-run hiring plans unchanged. Instead, updated beliefs increase productivity and financial expectations with minor wage adjustments, implying within-firm inequality like limited rent-sharing. Employers also anticipate new tasks in legal tech, compliance, and AI interaction, and report higher training and adoption intentions.
Similar Papers
Barriers to AI Adoption: Image Concerns at Work
General Economics
Workers use AI less when watched, hurting jobs.
AI and jobs. A review of theory, estimates, and evidence
General Economics
AI helps workers do jobs faster and better.
Automation, AI, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Knowledge
General Economics
AI might hurt job learning, but can help fix it.